This is of concern as someone may want to redefine defaults in the long run and will be locked with the same programs *forever*. Choose Evince as preferred (System Settings> Preferred Applications) Install evince and/or okular via the software managerĨ. The third time the program opens without a choice.ħ. Open again and choose "Document Viewer" two more times.Ħ. pdf and attach on a note (via drag and drop)ĥ. Install Joplin1.8.5 from the Software manager (tested from another source, same problem)ģ. Fresh Linux Mint 20.1 x86_64 Cinnamon install in English.Ģ. # Steps to reproduce (I did on another computer - same problem)ġ. When I uninstall Xreader, Joplin just does not open the file. This points to a problem in Home folder, but **not** the. config files, rolled back using timeshift ), and still Joplin opens directly. I tried with no success to have the choice once more (reinstalled Joplin, deleted folder joplin-desktop folder in. Joplin is now locked to using Xreader (for pdfs), when I wanted it to point to Evince (which is actually the default / preferred program on the system). But again, it is not (as you can reproduce below), hence a possible bug. Of course, the logical conclusion is that Joplin is using the list of system preferred programs. While for "toggle external editing" you can choose which program to use in settings, for the attachments there is no location whatsoever where you can reset to another program *inside* Joplin. The same behaviour occurred while choosing for "toggle external editing". On the fourth time, Joplin seems to assume the correct program and opens directly. … This occurs exactly three times for each extension. It's weird, not at all what I usually use, and comes in 10 variants.While opening an attached file, Joplin asks me to choose a program from a list. Visually scanning the outline of the doc I'm currently working on is something I do often, and when the MD syntax in it is displayed but isn't rendered, that just makes me slow down to parse it - basically defeating the point of adding any formatting to a heading.Īnd I think I'll give this theme a try. But I like my oft-used tools to offer the best experience possible. You might suggest that details like these don't really matter and that it's not reason enough to pay for Typora. MarkText doesn't support all of those tags (like the = mark syntax, which I use a lot), and even the ones it does support, it doesn't render in the Outline (called ToC there). Notice how Typora (left) correctly interprets MD and displays it both in the text, as well as in the Outline. This is something that surprisingly few programs handle out-of-the-box. When writing notes, I often use headings with additional markup - links, highlights, formatting. What is more significant for me is how it handles the little things like navigating around files, the document outline, and the like. I like the visual theming and formatting more, but those are not that significant. The "details" of the editing experience are where Typora comes out on top. So it probably isn't just a case of enabling one of the standard MD plugins. There are some requests to add them, but some are years old. Interestingly, some features aren't supported by either one: things like definitions, abbreviations, etc. Most of the general functionality is similar (or, well, identical.) Typora also has better export features IIRC, but I don't use those, so it's not relevant for me. That one is free and open source, so I went to compare it, to see if I maybe needn't have spent money. It's really good, and at ~17€ it isn't expensive.Ī day after that I remembered that of all the editors I tried before settling on Typora, there was one that was kinda similar - MarkText. So when I launched Typora and got a popup that the beta expired, I went and bought the full version. I mostly use it when editing larger documents or formatting bigger swaths of text. External editor is a feature where you can open the note you're looking at in Joplin in some external editor, in case you need more features or a different editing experience.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |